We believe the first principle of
government is the protection of Life, Liberty and Property. We believe
in the Rule of Law. And, we do not believe in or advocate the
initiation of force to achieve political, social, or economic goals.
Since government is force, and it often conflicts with beliefs just
stated,
we consequently believe in a minimal and restricted state government so as to
allow society to form their own voluntary self-governing
relationships.
Declaration of Independence spoken, as it was meant to be.
When in the Course of human events, it
becomes necessary for
one
people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them
with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the
separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of
Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of
mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel
them to the separation.
We
hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
pursuit of Happiness.— That to secure these rights, Governments are
instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of
the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes
destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or
to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its
foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such
form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and
Happiness..............More
The True Spoilers Have Sold Out Our Liberties
And Our Property by
Marc Guttman
The mainstream media often professes that a “third” party or
independent candidate spoiled some election for one of the adorned
parties' candidate.
They'll claim Ralph Nader lost the 2000 presidential election for Al
Gore or Ross Perot lost the 1992 presidential
election for George H.W. Bush. The truth, however, is that Gore and
Bush were no more entitled to our votes than Nader or Perot. In
fact, Nader and Perot no more spoiled the elections for their
opponents than their opponents spoiled the election for them.
Pundits often argue whether Libertarian candidates “take more votes
away from” the Democrats, as Libertarians are stronger on personal
liberties, or the Republicans, as Libertarians are stronger on
fiscal responsibility. Libertarians also outshine both on peace,
promoting nonintervention overseas, preserving rights to privacy and
due process, ending corporate subsidies and favoritism, and
protecting property rights. And despite recent polls that
demonstrate that there are just as many libertarian-minded Americans
as there are neoconservatives and neoliberals, the mainstream media
continues to tell us which candidates are viable from either of the
two establishment parties, side-lining the rest of us..................................................................More